Audio Version
The end of the silent subscriber
For years, subscription businesses were built around convenience. Customers signed up once, renewals happened automatically, and services became part of everyday life.
That model is starting to strain.
As the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers (DMCC) Act 2024 comes into force during 2026, alongside the growth of bank‑led subscription controls, merchants are entering a far more exposed world. If you make it too difficult for a customer to leave, their bank will increasingly do it for them.
And when that happens, your customer relationship ends instantly.
Banking apps are now between you and your customer
Banks are no longer just moving money. They are increasingly shaping how subscriptions are managed.
UK players like Monzo, Revolut and NatWest now surface recurring payments directly inside their apps. Card payments, Direct Debits and newer mechanisms such as Variable Recurring Payments (VRPs) are grouped, labelled and managed in one place.
It may look like a simple UI update, but it fundamentally changes control.
By standardising how subscriptions appear, banks gain greater visibility into cancellation behaviour, payment revocations and merchant friction.
“When a user sees a clean ‘Cancel’ or ‘Stop payment’ button in their banking app, they will use it.” – Sam Appleby
If your own cancellation journey is buried behind logins, prompts and confirmation screens, the exit moves out of your hands and, ultimately, the bank becomes the decision‑maker.
The consequence is forced cancellations, higher stop‑payment rates and growing scrutiny from card schemes. Merchants with poor metrics already face closer monitoring. Over time, that pressure often feeds into higher scheme fees and tighter risk classification.
Schemes have a long history of targeting behaviour. As payment habits shift, their focus shifts with them. Balancing cardholders, issuers and acquirers often results in higher costs or penalties for merchants that miss required thresholds.
Why subscriptions are getting properly labelled
Subscription visibility has always been fragmented.
A streaming service on a card looks nothing like a gym membership on Direct Debit. From a bank’s perspective, linking these payments has historically been difficult.
As Commercial VRPs roll out and payment metadata standards improve, subscriptions are starting to carry something closer to a digital passport for banks. They can see who the merchant is, what the limits are and how access can be revoked immediately.
This creates a quiet but material shift. Poorly structured data and inconsistent descriptors now work against you. If a subscription cannot be clearly identified or managed, banks can default to protecting the customer.
Compliance won’t be enough
Speaking to merchants, many are responding through a compliance lens. Renewal reminders, clearer terms and updated cancellation wording are now mandatory under the DMCC regime.
But compliance alone won’t move the business forward.
If the bank blocks a payment, there is no save potential, no recovery flow and no second conversation. The customer is simply gone.
That makes the payments stack critical. Transparent exits help preserve the relationship. Clean identifiers and consistent metadata reduce friction with banks. Over time, better behaviour also limits exposure to scheme fees and risk flags.
Easy exits now play a direct role in protecting margin.
Where we help
The subscription payments market is going through a structural shift. Control is moving closer to banks, regulation is tightening and payment rails are becoming more opinionated.
As that happens, visibility and control start to drift. Payment methods fragment, data becomes harder to reconcile, and merchants lose direct control over how customers manage and exit their subscriptions.
By analysing flows across recurring transactions, we show how cancellations, payment metadata and payment design now shape risk and cost; exactly how the payments supply chain actually sees it.
By treating these changes as a margin lever, you can retain control of subscription customers rather than losing them to the convenience of bank‑led cancellation.
As banking apps take a more active role, opaque exits are harder to hide. You risk losing customers, losing control, and paying more to serve the customers who remain.